INDIGO Home University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign logo uic building uic pavilion uic student center

Estimating DEA Confidence Intervals with Statistical Panel Data Analysis

Show full item record

Bookmark or cite this item:

Files in this item

File Description Format
PDF JAS_14apr2011.pdf (2MB) (no description provided) PDF
Title: Estimating DEA Confidence Intervals with Statistical Panel Data Analysis
Author(s): Barnum, Darold; Schumock, Glen T.; Shields, Karen L.; Walton, Surrey M.
Subject(s): Data Envelopment Analysis Econometrics DEA Efficiency Probability Statistics
Abstract: There is a conflict between Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) theory's requirement that inputs (outputs) be substitutable, and the ubiquitous use of nonsubstitutable inputs and outputs in DEA applications to hospitals. This paper develops efficiency indicators valid for nonsubstitutable variables. Then, using a sample of 87 community hospitals, it compares the new measures' efficiency estimates with those of conventional DEA measures. DEA substantially overestimated the hospitals' efficiency on the average, and reported many inefficient hospitals to be efficient. Further, it greatly overestimated the efficiency of some hospitals but only slightly overestimated the efficiency of others, thus making any comparisons among hospitals questionable. These results suggest that conventional DEA models should not be used to estimate the efficiency of hospitals unless there is empirical evidence that the inputs (outputs) are substitutable. If inputs (outputs) are not substitutes, efficiency indicators valid for nonsubstitutability should be employed, or, before applying DEA, the nonsubstitutable variables should be combined using an appropriate weighting scheme or statistical methodology.
Issue Date: 2011-12-15
Publisher: Springer Verlag
Citation Info: Barnum, D. T., Walton, S. M., Shields, K. L., & Schumock, G. T. 2011. Measuring hospital efficiency with Data Envelopment Analysis: nonsubstitutable vs. substitutable inputs and outputs. Journal of Medical Systems, 35(6): 1393-1401. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-009-9416-0
Type: Article
Description: Post print version of article may differ from published version. The original publication is available at; DOI: 10.1007/s10916-009-9416-0
Date Available in INDIGO: 2012-05-22

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record


Country Code Views
United States of America 348
China 188
Russian Federation 64
United Kingdom 19
Netherlands 9


My Account


Access Key