INDIGO Home University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign logo uic building uic pavilion uic student center

Political-Media Relations and the Power of Party-Based Regimes

Show full item record

Bookmark or cite this item:

Files in this item

File Description Format
PDF DiMaggio_Anthony.pdf (2MB) (no description provided) PDF
Title: Political-Media Relations and the Power of Party-Based Regimes
Author(s): DiMaggio, Anthony
Advisor(s): Doris, Graber A.
Contributor(s): Andrew, McFarland S.; Andrew, Rojecki; Ali, Riaz; Carlos, Parodi
Department / Program: Political Science
Graduate Major: Political Science
Degree Granting Institution: University of Illinois at Chicago
Degree: PhD, Doctor of Philosophy
Genre: Doctoral
Subject(s): mass media communication political parties American politics indexing hegemony pluralism liberal media political economy political science
Abstract: Symbiotic Politics: Political-Media Relations and the Power of Party-Based Regimes Anthony Ross Ray DiMaggio, Ph.D. Department of Political Science University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago, Illinois (2012) Dissertation Chairperson: Doris A. Graber This dissertation analyzes the ways in which political parties influence mass media content. It specifically analyzes the partisan composition of government – whether Congress and the Presidency are controlled by one party, the other, or whether control is split between them – and how the composition of government influences how media organizations report public policy and American politics. This study examines a variety of models that try to explain media bias, including those claiming that journalists share a liberal media bias, a pluralistic bias (in which room exists for all types of state and non-state actors in reports), a hegemonic (or pro-business) bias, or a pro-government, pro-official source bias (known as “indexing”) more generally. This study finds evidence that the pro-official source (indexing) bias is the strongest model of the four for explaining how journalists report on public policy issues. More specifically, the composition of government (which parties control Congress and the Presidency) is the strongest factor influencing how media outlets report political conflicts and debates as related to public policy. The pluralistic model of bias is mostly rejected in reporting, since state actors (over non-state actors) overwhelmingly dominate stories, although evidence of a balance between state and non-state actors is found on the op-ed pages of major newspapers. The liberal media bias model is roundly disconfirmed in this study, with little to no evidence that journalists regularly tailor their reporting to fit a liberal agenda. The hegemonic bias model is also rejected in terms of accounting for the ways in which reporters cover stories related to public policy. Hegemonic (pro-business) forces, however, may play a role in influencing not so much what appears in stories, but what does not appear, due to the advertising pressures exerted on editors to leave out of stories those views that are critical of business interests altogether.
Issue Date: 2012-12-13
Genre: thesis
Rights Information: Copyright 2012 Anthony DiMaggio
Date Available in INDIGO: 2012-12-13
Date Deposited: 2012-08

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record


Country Code Views
United States of America 350
China 226
Russian Federation 26
United Kingdom 22
Germany 9


My Account


Access Key