University of Illinois at Chicago
Browse
Research engagement.pdf (164.88 kB)

Research engagement of health sciences librarians: a survey of research-related activities and attitudes.

Download (164.88 kB)
Version 2 2019-12-02, 17:33
Version 1 2016-06-13, 00:00
journal contribution
posted on 2019-12-02, 17:33 authored by S Lessick, C Perryman, BL Billman, KM Alpi, Sandra L De GrooteSandra L De Groote, TD Jr. Babin
Introduction: The extent to which health sciences librarians are engaged in research is a little-studied question. This study assesses the research activities and attitudes of Medical Library Association (MLA) members, including the influence of work affiliation. Methods: An online survey was designed using a combination of multiple-choice and open-ended questions and distributed to MLA members. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, content analysis, and significance testing. The authors used statistical tools and categorized openended question topics by the constant comparative method, also applying the broad subject categories used in a prior study. Pearson’s chi-square analysis was performed on responses to determine significant differences among respondents employed in three different institutional environments. Results: Analysis showed that 79% of respondents read research articles at least once a month; 58% applied published research studies to practice; 44% had conducted research; 62% reported acting on research had enhanced their libraries; 38% had presented findings; and 34% had authored research articles. Hospital librarians were significantly less likely than academic librarians to have participated in research activities. Highly ranked research benefits, barriers, and competencies of health sciences librarians are described. Conclusions: Findings indicate that health sciences librarians are actively engaged in research activities. Practice implications for practitioners, publishers, and stakeholders are discussed. Results suggest that practitioners can use published research results and results from their own research to affect practice decisions and improve services. Future studies are needed to confirm and extend these findings, including the need for intervention studies to increase research and writing productivity.

Funding

MLA Research Section for funding access to the online survey platform, SurveyMonkey.

History

Publisher Statement

This is a copy of an article published in the Journal of the Medical Library Association © 2016 Medical Library Association Publications.© The Authors.

Publisher

Medical Library Association

Language

  • en_US

issn

1536-5050

Issue date

2016-04-01

Usage metrics

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC