posted on 2013-11-15, 00:00authored byLinda L. McCreary, Chang Gi Park, Lucy Gomez, Serena Peterson, David Pino, Beverly J. McElmurry
Background: School-based programs combating childhood obesity often lack resources to
incorporate strong evaluation components. This paper describes a collaborative evaluation
conducted by partners implementing Active Living by Design (ALbD) programs at one Chicago
elementary school.
Purpose: To assess ALbD program outcomes by triangulating various forms of evidence
gathered while implementing these programs.
Methods: An exploratory, mixed-methods design was used to collect and analyze data from
numerous physical activity (PA) initiatives implemented at the school from 2004-2009. The
researchers triangulated quantitative (student BMI data, student standardized test and discipline
data, classroom PA logs, and student PA knowledge surveys) and qualitative (classroom PA logs
and open-ended teacher surveys questions) findings to assess outcomes.
Results: Students continuously enrolled at this school from 1st through 4th grades, those most
exposed to ALbD activities over time, had significantly lower BMI after 4 years, compared with
peers who transferred to the school after 1st grade. Student achievement on standardized tests
improved between 2004 (prior to initiating ALbD activities) and 2008. Visits to the Disciplinary
Office dropped dramatically over the 4-year period. Teacher interviews and surveys and
classroom Take 10! activity logs revealed that the Take 10! Program was implemented
enthusiastically by all grades. The Physical Activity Knowledge Survey revealed a significant
increase in PA knowledge after instituting these activities.
Conclusion: Collaborative efforts to amass and analyze a variety of data demonstrated the
effects of implementing a variety of health promotion activities in one school, documenting the
growth of a “culture of health” in that school community.
History
Publisher Statement
NOTICE: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol 43, Issue 5 Suppl 4, (2012). DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.06.030