posted on 2018-06-18, 00:00authored byJennifer Wiley, Tim George, Keith Rayner
Two experiments investigated the effects of domain knowledge on the resolution of ambiguous words with dominant meanings related to baseball. When placed in a sentence context that strongly biased toward the non-baseball meaning (positive evidence), or excluded the baseball meaning (negative evidence), baseball experts had more difficulty than non-experts resolving the ambiguity. Sentence contexts containing positive evidence supported earlier resolution than did the negative evidence condition for both experts and non-experts. These experiments extend prior findings, and can be seen as support for the reordered access model of lexical access, where both prior knowledge and discourse context influence the availability of word meanings.
Funding
This work was supported by NIH Grant HD17246 and was conducted in part while the first author was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship on NIMH Training Grant MH16745 and the third author was supported by NIMH Research Scientist Award MH01255
History
Publisher Statement
Copyright @ SAGE Publications
Citation
Wiley, J., George, T. and Rayner, K. Baseball fans don't like lumpy batters: Influence of domain knowledge on the access of subordinate meanings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2018. 71(1): 93-102. 10.1080/17470218.2016.1251470.