posted on 2014-10-28, 00:00authored bySuzann K. Campbell, Laura Zawacki, Kristin M. Rankin, Joseph C. Yoder, Nicole Shapiro, Zhuoying Li, Rosemary White-Traut
Purpose: Examine agreement between the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) and the Bayley III. Methods: 145 infants born at 29-34 weeks gestation with socioenvironmental risk factors were tested on the TIMP and Bayley III at 6 weeks corrected age (CA). Scores were correlated to assess convergence/divergence of content. Decision analysis using a cutoff of the mean on the Bayley Motor Composite and -.5 and -1 SD from the mean on the TIMP assessed agreement on delay/non-delay. Results: The TIMP-Bayley Motor Composite correlation was .546, with Cognitive was .310, and with Language was .281. Nine percent of infants scored below -1.0 SD on the TIMP while no child performed below -1 SD on the Bayley Motor scale (sensitivity 31%). Conclusions: Convergent validity between the TIMP and the Bayley Motor scale was demonstrated, but no infant showed delay on any Bayley scale. The TIMP is preferred for early assessment of infants.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Child Health and
Human Development, the National Institute of Nursing Research (1 R01 HD050738-01A2), and the Harris Foundation (Dr White-Traut, Principal Investigator).
History
Publisher Statement
Post print version of article may differ from published version. The final publication is available at www.lww.com/; DOI:10.1097/PEP.0b013e31829db85b