An enduring focus of scholarly work on global production networks (GPNs) is the process of insertion into production networks and the capacity of places to shape their manner of inclusion. Sometimes overlooked
are ways in which these insertions are based on an evolving set of exclusions. A disarticulations
perspective trains our attention on the mutual interplay between moments of inclusion and exclusion
that produce uneven geographies and histories of development, foregrounding place-specific factors
and offering a framework for understanding local experimentation. Firms continue to restructure under
relentless pressure to improve performance and the concomitant need to experiment, causing firm strategy
to shape-shift and re-making relations of inclusion and exclusion. In the distribution function of global
supply chains, the prevailing value-creation strategy is downward pressure on the cost of labor, but
this perhaps suggests a false sense of stability. Using data gathered in the distribution hub just outside of
Chicago, I examine the role of labor market intermediaries in re-negotiating the boundaries of inclusion.
This article explores processes of linking and delinking subsets of workers and the differential implications for worker segments and their attachment to the supply chain. Inscribed in the absorption of places
and workers into GPNs are ongoing processes of disarticulation, evident in this case through the labor market strategies pursued by local firms and temporary staffing agencies. These processes lay bare the mechanisms that reproduce capital-labor relationships in global supply chains.
Funding
The research presented in this paper was supported in part by
Grant # T42OH008672-08 PPRT from NIOSH
History
Publisher Statement
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Geoforum. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Geoforum. 2015. 60: 53-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.01.009.