posted on 2016-01-28, 00:00authored byJ. Spanjol, L. Tam, V. Tam
This study examines how the match (vs. mismatch) between personal and firm-level
values regarding environmental responsibility affects employee job satisfaction and creativity
and contributes to three literature streams (i.e., social corporate responsibility, creativity, and
person-environment fit). Building on the person-environment (P-E) fit literature, we propose and
test environmental orientation fit vs. nonfit effects on creativity, identifying job satisfaction as a
mediating mechanism and regulatory pressure as a moderator. An empirical investigation
indicates that the various environmental orientation fit conditions affect job satisfaction and
creativity differently. More specifically, environmental orientation fit produces greater job
satisfaction and creativity when the employee and organization both demonstrate high concern
for the environment (i.e., a high-high environmental orientation fit condition) than when both
display congruent low concern for the environmental (i.e., a low-low environmental orientation
fit condition). Furthermore, for employees working in organizations that fit their personal
environmental orientation, strong regulatory pressure to comply with environmental standards diminishes the positive fit effect on job satisfaction and creativity, while regulatory pressure does not affect the job satisfaction and creativity of employees whose personal environmental orientation is incongruent with that of the organization.
History
Publisher Statement
Post print version of article may differ from published version. The final publication is available at springerlink.com; DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2208-6.