posted on 2012-06-25, 00:00authored byDingcai Cao, Andrew J. Zele, Joel Pokorny, David Y. Lee, Leonard V. Messner, Christopher Diehl, Susan Ksiazek
Purpose: To evaluate contrast threshold and contrast gain in patients with optic neuritis
under conditions designed to favor mediation by either the inferred Magnocellular (MC-)
or Parvocellular (PC-) pathway.
Methods: Achromatic and chromatic contrast discrimination was measured in 11
patients with unilateral or bilateral optic neuritis and 18 age-matched controls with
normal vision, using achromatic steady-pedestal and pulsed-pedestal paradigms to bias performance toward the MC- or PC- pathway respectively. Additionally, L-M chromatic discrimination at equiluminance was evaluated using the steady-pedestal paradigm. . A physiologically plausible model could describe the data with parameters accounting
for contrast gain and contrast sensitivity in the inferred MC- or PC- pathway. The fitted
parameters from the affected eye by optic neuritis were compared with those from the
normal eyes using Generalized Estimation Equation (GEE) models that can account for
within-subject correlations.
Results: Compared with normal eyes, the affected eyes had significantly higher
saturation parameters when measured with both the achromatic pulsed-pedestal
paradigm [GEE: β(se) = 0.35(0.06), p < 0.001] and the chromatic discrimination
paradigm [β(se) = 0.18(0.08), p = 0.015], suggesting contrast gain in the inferred PCpathway is reduced; the affected eyes also had reduced absolute sensitivity in the
inferred MC-pathway measured with the achromatic steady-pedestal paradigm [β(se) =
0.12 (0.04), p = 0.005].
Conclusion: Optic neuritis produced large sensitivity loss mediated by the MCpathway
and contrast gain losses in the inferred PC- pathway. A clinical framework is
presented for interpreting contrast sensitivity and gain loss to chromatic and achromatic stimuli in terms of retinal and post-retinogeniculate loci contributions to detection and discrimination.
Funding
National Eye Institute grants R01EY019651 (D. Cao) and by Australia Research Council Discovery Projects DP1096354 (AJZ) supported this work.
History
Publisher Statement
Post print version of article may differ from published version. The definitive version is available through Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology at
doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7644
Publisher
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology