posted on 2016-08-02, 00:00authored byJP Spillane, M Hopkins, T Sweet
Understanding those factors associated with the existence of a tie among school staff is important
because such ties are a necessary condition for social capital. Yet, there is a dearth of research
on those factors associated with the existence of these ties. In this paper, we use covariate
blockmodels and a p2 model to examine the role of both formal organizational structures and
individual characteristics in shaping advice and information interactions about instruction within
and between schools. Our findings suggest that, while individual characteristics are significantly
associated with having a within school tie, aspects of the formal school organization—gradelevel
assignment, having a formally designated leadership position, and teaching a single
grade—are also significant and have larger estimated effects than individual characteristics. With
respect to between school ties, we similarly found that the formal organization superseded
individual characteristics, and that having a subject-specific formal leadership position, more
than anything, predicted instructional advice and information ties. In addition, our analysis of
interview data supports and extends these findings by showing that school staff associate formal
positions with instructional expertise in subject-specific domains and that formal positions work
in tandem with other aspects of the organizational infrastructure such as organizational routines
to influence school staff members’ interactions about instruction.
Funding
Work on this article is supported by the Distributed Leadership Studies (http://
www.distributedleadership.org) funded by research grants from the National Science Foundation
(REC–9873583, RETA Grant # EHR – 0412510), the Institute for Education Sciences (Grant #
R305E040085), and the Spencer Foundation (200000039). Northwestern University’s School of Education and Social Policy and Institute for Policy Research supported this work.