PROD555-2.pdf (1.21 MB)
Measuring Efficiency under Fixed Proportion Technologies
journal contribution
posted on 2012-03-02, 00:00 authored by Darold T. Barnum, John M. GleasonData Envelopment Analysis (DEA) applications frequently involve nonsubstitutable inputs and nonsubstitutable outputs (that is, fixed proportion technologies). However, DEA theory requires substitutability. In this paper, we illustrate the consequences of nonsubstitutability on DEA efficiency estimates, and we develop new efficiency indicators that are similar to those of conventional DEA models except that they require nonsubstitutability. Then, using simulated and real-world datasets that encompass fixed proportion technologies, we compare DEA efficiency estimates with those of the new indicators. The examples demonstrate that DEA efficiency estimates are biased when inputs and outputs are nonsubstitutable. The degree of bias varies considerably among Decision Making Units, resulting in substantial differences in efficiency rankings between DEA and the new measures. And, over 90 percent of the units that DEA identifies as efficient are, in truth, not efficient. We conclude that when inputs and outputs are not substituted for either technological or socio-economic/legal reasons, conventional DEA models should be replaced with models that account for nonsubstitutability.
History
Publisher Statement
Post print version of article may differ from published version. The original publication is available at springerlink.com; DOI: 10.1007/s11123-010-0194-y.Publisher
Springer VerlagLanguage
- en_US
issn
0895-562XIssue date
2011-06-01Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC