posted on 2017-11-16, 00:00authored byKS Lloyd, IL Bolotin, M Schmeling, L Hanley, IV Veryovkin
Fabrication of nanocone arrays on Si surfaces was demonstrated using grazing incidence
irradiation with 1 keV Ar+
ions concurrently sputtering the surface and depositing metal
impurity atoms on it. Among three materials compared as co-sputtering targets Si, Cu and
stainless steel, only the steel was found to assist the growth of dense arrays of nanocones at
ion fluences between 1018 and 1019 ions/cm2
. The structural characterization of samples
irradiated with these ion fluences using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Atomic Force
Microscopy revealed that regions far away from co-sputtering targets are covered with
nanoripples, and that nanocones popped-up out of the rippled surfaces when moving closer to
co-sputtering targets, with their density gradually increasing and reaching saturation in the
regions close to these targets. The characterization of the samples’ chemical composition with
Total Reflection X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
revealed that the concentration of metal impurities originating from stainless steel (Fe, Cr and
Ni) was relatively high in the regions with high density of nanocones (Fe reaching a few atomic
percent) and much lower (factor of 10 or so) in the region of nanoripples. Total Reflection Xray
Fluorescence Spectrometry measurements showed that higher concentrations of these
impurities are accumulated under the surface in both regions. X-ray Photoelectron
Spectroscopy experiments showed no direct evidence of metal silicide formation occurring on
one region only (nanocones or nanoripples) and thus showed that this process could not be the
driver of nanocone array formation. Also, these measurements indicated enhancement in oxide
formation on regions covered by nanocones. Overall, the results of this study suggest that the
difference in concentration of metal impurities in the thin near-surface layer forming under ion
irradiation might be responsible for the differences in surface structures.
Funding
This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (DMR-1206175) and the
University of Illinois at Chicago.
History
Publisher Statement
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Surface Science. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Surface Science. 2016. 652: 334-343. DOI:
10.1016/j.susc.2016.03.016.