posted on 2016-04-04, 00:00authored byWei Zhang, Tong Zhou, Shwu-Fan Ma, Robert F. Machado, Sangeeta M. Bhorade, Joe GN. Garcia
Background: Lung transplantation remains the only viable treatment option for the majority of patients with
advanced lung diseases. However, 5-year post-transplant survival rates remain low primarily secondary to chronic
rejection. Novel insights from global gene expression profiles may provide molecular phenotypes and therapeutic
targets to improve outcomes after lung transplantation.
Methods: Whole-genome gene expression profiling was performed in a cohort of patients that underwent lung
transplantation as well as healthy controls using the Affymetrix Human Exon 1.0ST Array. To explore the potential roles of
microRNAs (miRNAs) in regulating lung transplantation-associated gene dysregulation, miRNA expression levels were also
profiled in the same samples using the Exiqon miRCURY LNA Array.
Results: In a cohort of 18 lung transplant patients, 364 dysregulated genes were identified in Caucasian patients relative
to normal individuals without pulmonary disorders. Pathway enrichment analysis of the dysregulated genes pointed to
Gene Ontology biological processes such as “defense response”, “immune response” and “response to wounding”. We
then compared the expression profiles of potential regulating miRNAs, suggesting that dysregulation of a number of lung
transplantation-associated genes (e.g., ATR, FUT8, LRRC8B, NFKBIA) may be attributed to the dysregulation of their
respective regulating miRNAs.
Conclusions: Following human lung transplantation, a substantial proportion of genes, particularly those genes involved
in certain biological processes like immune response, were dysregulated in patients relative to their healthy counterparts.
This exploratory analysis of the relationships between miRNAs and their gene targets in the context of lung
transplantation warrants further investigation and may serve as novel therapeutic targets in lung transplant complications.
Funding
This work was supported by an NIH grant, HL05864. The funding body had
no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or
preparation of the manuscript.