posted on 2018-03-05, 00:00authored byA.S. Hedayat, Y. Zhou, M. Yang
Some design aspects related to three complex nonlinear models
are studied in this paper. For the Klimpel’s flotation recovery model, it is
proved that regardless of model parameter and optimality criterion, any
optimal design can be based on two design points and the right boundary
is always a design point. For this model, an analytical solution for a Doptimal
design is derived. For the 2-parameter chemical kinetics model, it
is found that the locally D-optimal design is a saturated design. Under a
certain situation, any optimal design under this model can be based on two
design points. For the 2n-parameter compartment model, compared to the
upper bound by Carath´eodory’s theorem, the upper bound of the maximal
support size is significantly reduced by the analysis of related Tchebycheff
Systems. Some numerically calculated A-optimal designs for both Klimpel’s
flotation recovery model and 2-parameter chemical kinetic model are presented.
For each of the three models discussed, the D-efficiency when the
parameter misspecification happens is investigated. Based on two real examples
from the mining industry, it is demonstrated how the estimation
precision can be improved if optimal designs would be adopted. A simulation
study is conducted to investigate the efficiencies of adaptive designs.
Funding
Research is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation Grants DMS-0904125 and
DMS-1306394
Research is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation Grants DMS-0707013 and
DMS-1322797
History
Publisher Statement
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of
Statistical Planning and Inference. 2014. 154(1): 102-115. DOI:
10.1016/j.jspi.2014.05.005.