University of Illinois at Chicago
PsychologyGuides&InfoLit_postprint.pdf (1.21 MB)
Download file

Psychology Guides and Information Literacy: The Current Landscape and a Proposed Framework for Standards-Based Development

Download (1.21 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2015-03-17, 00:00 authored by Kimberly Pendell, Annie Armstrong
Purpose: In order to assess the existing landscape of research guides as instructional tools, researchers examined the instructional content and associated media formats of online psychology research guides. The study provides an understanding of current guide author practice and informs the further development of guides as key instructional tools. Design/methodology/approach: Researchers devised an instrument utilizing Standard Two of the ACRL’s Psychology Information Literacy Standards and inventoried the instructional content and associated media formats of a sample set of 36 psychology research guides. Findings: Although online research guides offer a platform for presenting instructional content in myriad formats, psychology research guides rarely incorporate instructional content. Research limitations/implications: Psychology course guides were not part of the sample set; it is possible that guide authors approach the addition of instructional content in course guides differently than more general subject guides. Practical implications: This paper provides an overview of how libraries are, or are not, using research guides as part of their instruction program. The researchers propose a framework for adding instructional content to psychology guides employing Standard Two. Originality/value: Considering the ubiquity of online research guides on academic library websites, little research on the existing integration of instructional content into guides has been published. This study offers a snapshot of current guide practice and proposes a practical, systematic, and unique model for aligning information literacy standards with guide content areas which has not been proposed elsewhere.





  • en



Issue date


Usage metrics


    No categories selected