Response to Fitzgerald & Barenholtz: There is still much work to be done for digital classifiers

Karnik, Niranjan S; Thompson, Hale M; Afshar, Majid

doi:10.25417/uic.21153199.v1

Response to Fitzgerald & Barenholtz: There is still much work to be done for digital classifiers

journal contribution

posted on 2022-11-11, 22:26 authored by Niranjan S Karnik, Hale M Thompson, Majid Afshar

No description supplied

History

Citation

Karnik, N. S., Thompson, H. M.Afshar, M. (2022). Response to Fitzgerald & Barenholtz: There is still much work to be done for digital classifiers. Addiction, 117(5), 1496-1496. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15788

Publisher

Wiley

Language

en

issn

0965-2140

Usage metrics

Keywords

machine learning natural language processing non-inferiority screening statistical sensitvity unhealthy alcohol use non-inferiority, screening Substance Abuse Medical and Health Sciences Psychology and Cognitive Sciences

Licence

In Copyright

Exports

RefWorks

BibTeX

Ref. manager

Endnote

DataCite

NLM

DC

Response to Fitzgerald & Barenholtz: There is still much work to be done for digital classifiers

History

Citation

Publisher

Language

issn

Usage metrics

Categories

Keywords

Licence

Exports