posted on 2015-02-02, 00:00authored byE Kocjancic, L Tu, T Erickson, E Gheiler, D Van Drie
Purpose: We describe the safety and efficacy of the Altis Single Incision Sling
System for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence through
12 months.
Materials and Methods: In this study we collected a variety of safety and efficacy
measures relevant to the assessment of urinary incontinence. The primary effi-
cacy end point was improvement in 24-hour pad weight test. Other efficacy
measures included the cough stress test, Urogenital Distress Inventory-Short
Form, Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form, Patient Global Impression
of Improvement and 3-day voiding diary. Safety was evaluated through
assessment of device and procedure related adverse events.
Results: Of 116 surgical attempts 113 subjects were implanted with the Altis
sling. Of these patients 103 had primary efficacy data at baseline and 6 months,
and 101 had efficacy data at baseline and 12 months. Consequently 88 (85.4%)
subjects at 6 months and 91 (90.1%) at 12 months achieved a 50% or greater
reduction in pad weight. The cough stress test was negative for 95 (92.2%)
subjects at 6 months and 91 (90.1%) at 12 months. A decrease in median leaks
per day was observed at 6 months and improvements in all patient reported
measures were observed through 12 months. A majority of subjects reported
feeling much better or very much better at 6 and 12 months, respectively. There
were no reports of mesh erosion or migration and no unanticipated adverse
events through 12 months.
Conclusions: The Altis sling appears to be safe and efficacious, and performs
as intended in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence through 12 months.
Funding
Financial interest and/or other relationship with Coloplast
History
Publisher Statement
NOTICE: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of urology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Urology.