8 files

The effect of decreased visual acuity on control of posture

journal contribution
posted on 27.05.2012, 00:00 by Sambit Mohapatra, Vennila Krishnan, Alexander S. Aruin
Objectives: The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of visual acuity on the anticipatory (APAs) and compensatory (CPAs) components of postural control. Methods: Ten individuals participated in the experiments involving perturbations induced by a pendulum while their visual acuity was altered. The different visual acuity conditions were no glasses, blurred vision induced by wearing glasses with positive or negative lenses, and no vision. EMG activity of trunk and leg muscles and ground reaction forces were recorded during the typical anticipatory and compensatory periods. Results: In the no vision condition the subjects did not generate APAs, which resulted in the largest displacements of the center of pressure (COP) after the perturbation (p<0.01). In all other visual conditions APAs were present showing a distal to proximal order of muscle activation. The subjects wearing positive glasses showed earlier and larger anticipatory EMGs than while wearing negative glasses or no glasses at all. Conclusions: The study outcome revealed that changes in visual acuity induced by wearing differently powered eye glasses alter the generation APAs and as a consequence, affect the compensatory components of postural control. Significance: The observed changes in APAs and CPAs in conditions with blurred vision induced by positive and negative glasses suggest the importance of individuals’ using glasses with an appropriate power. This outcome should be taken into consideration in balance rehabilitation of individuals wearing glasses.


This work was supported in part by NIH grant HD-51628 and NIDRR grant H133P060003


Publisher Statement

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Clinical Neurophysiology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in PUBLICATION, Vol. 123 , Issue 1, JAN 2012 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.06.008







Issue date


Usage metrics