posted on 2016-05-03, 00:00authored byHE Moss, JC Park, JJ McAnany
Purpose: To evaluate the photopic negative response (PhNR) as an index of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) function in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).
Methods: Amplitude and implicit time of the PhNR, as elicited by full-field, brief-luminance flashes was measures in IIH (n=10) and visually-normal control (n=15)subjects. Visual function was assessed in IIH subjects using standard automated perimetry mean deviation (SAP-MD) scores. Optic nerve structure was evaluated using the Frisén papilledema grading scale (FPG). Macula ganglion cell complex volume (GCCV) was extracted from optical coherence tomography images to assess RGC loss.
Results: Median PhNR amplitude was significantly lower in IIH subjects compared with control subjects (p=0.015, Mann-Whitney Rank Sum (MW)), but implicit time was similar (p=0.54, MW). In IIH subjects, PhNR amplitude and SAP-MD were correlated (Pearson’s r=0.78, p=0.008). GCCV was correlated with both SAP-MD (r=0.72, p=0.019) and PhNR amplitude (r=0.77, p=0.009). Multivariate linear regression models demonstrated that the correlation between GCCV and PhNR amplitude was improved by accounting for FPG in the model (r=0.94, p <0.0001), but the correlation between GCCV and SAP-MD was not (r=0.74, p =0.009).
Conclusions: PhNR amplitude, which can be decreased in IIH subjects, correlates well with a clinical measure of visual function (SAP-MD). In multivariate models it
correlated with both an imaging measure of chronic ganglion cell injury (GCCV) and a clinical measure of acute optic nerve head pathology (FPG). Further studies are needed to determine the clinical utility of PhNR as a marker for diagnosis and monitoring of IIH.
Funding
Funding/Support: NIH K12 EY021475, K23 EY024345, R00 EY019510, P30 EY01792, Illinois Society for the Prevention of Blindness Research Grant, unrestricted departmental grant from Research to Prevent Blindness.
History
Publisher Statement
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science . Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2015. 56(6): 3709-3714. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-16586.
Publisher
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology