posted on 2016-04-29, 00:00authored byZ Papacharissi
This essay is written in response and extension to the thoughts offered by danah boyd and Kate Crawford on whether Big Data change how we define knowledge. I suggest that
they do not, but they do reinforce and reproduce a form of communicating knowledge
that I have been referring to as a digital orality. Online networked platforms, supportive
of Big Data and a variety of similar analytical formulations, blend interpersonal and mass
storytelling practices variably, offering a reconciliation of primary and secondary orality
tendencies and tensions. Literacy, in the form of asking questions about the origins, the
textures, and the implications of Big Data, paves the path toward rendering data, small
or large, into new modalities of storytelling that a digital orality affords, mastering this orality, and turning these stories into meaningful forms of situated knowledge.