posted on 2016-01-14, 00:00authored byS. Sikder, J. Luo, P. Banerjee, C. Luciano, P. Kania, J.C. Song, E.S. Kahtani, D.P. Edward, A-E. Al Towerk
Purpose: To evaluate a haptic-based simulator, MicroVisTouch™, as an assessment tool
for capsulorhexis performance in cataract surgery. The study is a prospective, unmasked,
nonrandomized dual academic institution study conducted at the Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns
Hopkins Medical Center (Baltimore, MD, USA) and King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital
(Riyadh, Saudi Arabia).
Methods: This prospective study evaluated capsulorhexis simulator performance in
78 ophthalmology residents in the US and Saudi Arabia in the first round of testing and
40 residents in a second round for follow-up.
Results: Four variables (circularity, accuracy, fluency, and overall) were tested by the simulator
and graded on a 0–100 scale. Circularity (42%), accuracy (55%), and fluency (3%) were
compiled to give an overall score. Capsulorhexis performance was retested in the original cohort
6 months after baseline assessment. Average scores in all measured metrics demonstrated statistically
significant improvement (except for circularity, which trended toward improvement) after
baseline assessment. A reduction in standard deviation and improvement in process capability
indices over the 6-month period was also observed.
Conclusion: An interval objective improvement in capsulorhexis skill on a haptic-enabled
cataract surgery simulator was associated with intervening operating room experience. Further
work investigating the role of formalized simulator training programs requiring independent simulator use must be studied to determine its usefulness as an evaluation tool.
Funding
This study was funded by King Khaled Eye Specialist
Hospital (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), National Eye Institute:
5R42EY018965-03 (Bethesda, MD, USA), and Research
to Prevent Blindness (New York, NY, USA). The authors
would like to acknowledge University of Illinois at Chicago
pre-med undergraduate student Naga Dharmavaram for his assistance with this paper. Mr Kania, Dr Banerjee, Mr Luo, and Dr Luciano’s work
was supported in part by ImmersiveTouch, Inc (Chicago,
IL, USA). The other authors report no conflicts of interest
in this work.