posted on 2013-10-24, 00:00authored byStephanie P. Liss
Clinical outcomes of root canal treatment (RCT) and single tooth implants (STI) have been well documented, although much less is known about patient preferences for these two treatment options. Two instruments designed to measure oral health quality of life, the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and the Semantic questionnaire, are available and have been shown to be valid and reliable (Slade). Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare and assess the quality of life issues associated with RCT and STI therapy in an urban population. Method: About 30 RCT and 30 STI patients that had a permanent restoration between 2009 and 2012, at the UIC College of Dentistry, participated in this study. After informed consent was obtained, the subjects completed two questionnaires to assess satisfaction with various aspects of treatment and quality of life, the OHIP-14 and a Semantic Differential Scale. Results were compared to existing data collected for patients that have received a STI at the UIC College of Dentistry. Results: STI and RCT patients are highly satisfied with their treatment. Conclusions: There was not a significant difference in oral health quality of life between patients receiving RCT or STI. This study is a first step in helping to clarify quality of life issues that are most significant to patients receiving either RCT or STI.