posted on 2019-12-01, 00:00authored byRobert English
The dissertation explores three different interpretations of the “humanity” which Kant claims is the basis of the innate right to freedom. It argues against two interpretations which fail to fully appreciate the metaphysical and normative underpinnings of the sense of humanity which Kant takes to ground the innate right. It then argues for a view on which moral personality, our capacity for morally responsible agency which presupposes transcendental freedom, is the foundation of the innate right to freedom
History
Advisor
Fleischacker, Samuel
Chair
Fleischacker, Samuel
Department
Philosophy
Degree Grantor
University of Illinois at Chicago
Degree Level
Doctoral
Degree name
PhD, Doctor of Philosophy
Committee Member
Sedgwick, Sally
Laden, Anthony
Varden, Helga
Sensen, Oliver