posted on 2019-08-01, 00:00authored byGauri Vaishampayan
This study examines the influence of a district-driven, whole-school STEM reform on school leadership and teachers’ organizational commitment. Through a replication case study design (Yin, 2009), interview data (N=21) was gathered from school administrators and teachers across four designated inclusive STEM high schools, as well as from district leaders and external stakeholders associated with the reform. Additionally, relevant data from supporting documents and survey data (N=69) from teachers was also collected. An analysis was conducted using matrices that compared findings from interviews, surveys and documents across sites through an inductive, comparative method. Findings show that organizational leadership practices were minimally aligned with the national and local policy goals of the reform. Leadership was fairly centralized at the district and school level with reform related roles and responsibilities primarily distributed among administrative staff. Teachers expressed feeling committed to the school, while also indicating having little to no involvement in the whole-school STEM model. Recommendations include (1) building commitment and capacity among district and school administrators, (2) considering a robust accountability system at the district and school level to further align leadership practices to the reform model, and (3) engaging teachers in organizational leadership practices to support building motivation and self-efficacy related to the reform.
History
Advisor
Mayrowetz, David
Chair
Mayrowetz, David
Department
Policy Studies in Urban Education
Degree Grantor
University of Illinois at Chicago
Degree Level
Doctoral
Degree name
PhD, Doctor of Philosophy
Committee Member
Superfine, Benjamin
Phillips, Nathan
Irby, Decoteau
LaForce, Melanie