posted on 2016-03-04, 00:00authored byAhmed K. Aboubakr, AA Shabana
The dynamics of large scale and complex multibody systems (MBS) that include flexible bodies
and contact/impact pairs is governed by stiff equations. Because explicit integration methods can
be very inefficient and often fail in the case of stiff problems,the use of implicit numerical
integration methods is recommended in this case. This paper presents a new and efficient
implementation of the two-loop implicit sparse matrix numerical integration (TLISMNI) method
proposed for the solution of constrained rigid and flexible MBS differential and algebraic
equations. The TLISMNI method has desirable features that include avoiding numerical
differentiation of the forces, allowing for an efficient sparse matrix implementation, and ensuring
that the kinematic constraint equations are satisfied at the position, velocity and acceleration
levels. In this method, a sparse Lagrangian augmented form of the equations of motion that
ensures that the constraints are satisfied at the acceleration level is used to solve for all the
accelerations and Lagrange multipliers. The generalized coordinate partitioning or recursive
methods can be used to satisfy the constraint equations at the position and velocity levels. In
order to improve the efficiency and robustness of the TLISMNI method, the simple iteration and
the Jacobian-Free Newton-Krylov approaches are used in this investigation. The new
implementation is tested using several low order formulas that include Hilber–Hughes–Taylor
(HHT), L- stable Park, A-stable Trapezoidal, and A-stable BDF methods. The HHT method
allow for including numerical damping. Discussion on which method is more appropriate to use
for a certain application is provided. The paper also discusses TLISMNI implementation issues
including the step size selection, the convergence criteria, the error control, and the effect of the
numerical damping. The use of the computer algorithm described in this paper is demonstrated
by solving complex rigid and flexible tracked vehicle models, railroad vehicle models, and very
stiff structure problems. The results, obtained using these low order formulas, are compared with
the results obtained using the explicit Adams-Bashforth predictor-corrector method. Using the
TLISMNI method, which does not require numerical differentiation of the forces and allows for
an efficient sparse matrix implementation, for solving complex and stiff structure problems leads
to significant computational cost saving as demonstrated in this paper. In some problems, it was
found that the new TLISMNI implementation is 35 times faster than the explicit AdamsBashforth
method.
History
Publisher Statement
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Sound and Vibration. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of
Sound and Vibration. 2015. 353: 220-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.05.008.