In this paper, we study the Bayesian look ahead sampling methods for allocating up to M observations among k populations to select the best population(s).
First, we investigated the properties of fixed sample-size
sampling algorithm proposed by Professor Klaus J. Miescke, which
always draws fixed number of observations at the next step. Then
we proposed and studied a m-truncated sampling algorithm, which
draws up to m observations sequentially.
Based on these two algorithms, respectively, two Bayesian
look-ahead sampling methods for allocating up to M observations
among k populations are developed. To investigate the properties
of and compare these two methods, we implement them to allocate up
to M observations among k normal distributions with the same
variance or k binomial populations to select the best population.
For given values of M, the Bayes risks of these two methods are
calculated or estimated. The smaller the Bayes risk, the better
the method. It turns out that when the sampling cost is large
compared with the decision loss, the second method is better than
the first. When the sampling cost is not very large, then in the
normal case the two methods are comparable, with one method
occasionally better than the other. On the other hand, in the
binomial case, the second method dominates most of the time. These two methods are then applied in various other situations.
History
Advisor
Miescke, Klaus J.
Department
Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science
Degree Grantor
University of Illinois at Chicago
Degree Level
Doctoral
Committee Member
Yang, Jie
Wang, Jing
Freels, Sally
Sclove, Stanley L.